Hockey Locker (Sad Toys- continued)

December 5th, 2011 § 0 comments § permalink

The remedy to Sad Toys is a locker for my kids to hang their hockey stuff. Let me know if you’re interested in a fancy plastic kitchen.

Sad toys.

November 7th, 2011 § 0 comments § permalink

Oh how their interests have changed. The coveted kitchen has been relegated to “drying rack” status. Also attached, initial design for a functional replacement.

Cam Gross’s location@7:45pm,6/10

June 10th, 2011 § 0 comments § permalink

 

image

Cam Gross’s location@7:45pm,6/10 http://google.com/u/m/wjNK5G

(This post was just me foolin’ around with the Android WordPress app while I was on vacation.)

Universal View – Web Application

May 2nd, 2011 § 0 comments § permalink

Originally Posted to the BBYOpen Blog (March 23, 2011)

 

UV, or Universal View, is a web application built on Google App Engine.  The application features are expressed as an API to a view layer. New features can be added and easily accessed by any views.  Data and experiences can be consistent across views while the interface for each view can be optimized for the device. Proof of Concept - Universal View on iPad2

The popularity of iPad and the inevitable crush of Android-based tablets had the Emerging Platforms (EP) team thinking about creating a shopping experience optimized for tablets.

We debated the fat client application vs. a more universal approach using HTML 5.  We opted to showcase the potential of a data driven HTML5 web application in order to create development efficiencies across the multiple tablet formats that aren’t possible when building native applications.  By building a web application, we are also prepared for future.

For the purpose of testing and demonstrations, we only show UV on iPad or iPad2 at this time.  We look forward to a time when the Android tablets mature enough to include a browser with hardware acceleration for CSS animations.

While we work on getting our tablet view ready for real customers to begin using it, it is our intention to continue building out the Universal View control layer as a sandbox for new features not currently offered in other BBY online/mobile shopping views. If all goes well, these APIs can be opened to outside developers in the future.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Why NFC? Our take…

May 2nd, 2011 § 0 comments § permalink

Originally posted to the BBYOpen Blog (March 28,2011).

The geek and financial press are all aflutter with talk of mobile wallets, mobile commerce and NFC. An individual could spend forty hours a week for a couple of months reading everything there is to know about the flood of start-ups, consortia, technology, and merchant efforts to prepare for this inevitable evolution in commerce.  You can read some samples of what is being said in the press;

Digitaltransactions.net

nfcdata.com,

Mobile Commerce Daily

Techcrunch.

We have a question.

Why NFC for transactions?

We agree that NFC could be a big deal. NFC offers the promise of great benefits.  One such benefit is a promise of secure transactions without a physical card or other payment type.  Another promise is the speed to integrate with merchants who have already adopted contact-less readers at their point of sale or are willing to incorporate them as a new offering.

Still, we’re struggling to find the differentiated customer benefits of NFC for transactions.  Secure payments from mobile devices are already possible without NFC. Of course, NFC is not just for payments.  The technology will provide another great input and interaction point for bridging the online and offline worlds for consumers in the way mobile codes (QR), for instance, do today.

How can merchants benefit from adopting the ability to transact with NFC enabled phones?  The answer to this one is eluding us, as well. Special offer delivery at the time of transaction?  NFC is not the only path to making that a reality.  It’s not going to make the cashier lines move faster.  It’s expensive to integrate especially if you don’t already have contact-less readers.  Merchant fees for NFC transactions are higher than the most platinum, signature, rewards laden credit cards.  It seems that the only motivating factor for retailers to enable NFC at point of sale is hypothetical future customer demand.

We’re lacking a customer benefit.  We’re lacking a merchant benefit.  Yet, NFC is coming.  Why is this train coming with such force?  Who will benefit?

The real beneficiaries of NFC seem to be phone OEMs, carriers, and payment networks who provide the readers.  By pressing NFC, these groups of companies stand to benefit by being involved and relevant in the transaction process.  It gives them an opportunity to act as a hub to skim a percentage from each transaction, a path to selling more contact-less readers, and/or to leverage the data.  Who helps provide this new revenue?  Customers.

Why NFC?  Are we missing the real problem NFC is solving for customers?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta